Founding
Fathers, Colonial Script, the
Federal Reserve and the National Debt
*This video from the Ludwig
von Mises Instituteis a must see
In Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged", Rand
describes
what an incredibly unique advancement America represented at it's
outset, that "for the first time, man's mind and money were set
free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only
fortunes-by-work..." that for the first time "there appeared the
real maker of wealth..." and that "No other language or nation
had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a
static quantity—to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted of
obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth
has to be created."
So how did those in possession of the Old
World's
vast fortunes at the time of the 13 American Colonies respond in
order to protect their fortunes, to keep freedom and capitalism from
encroaching upon their vast wealth, which until then had been attained
largely by looting and conquest ? How could they respond to this
new creature of capitalism ? Let's go back ...
On September 17, 1787, as he was leaving
Independence Hall in Philidelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked by a
citizen." What have you given us ?" Franklin replied, "A
republic, if you can keep it." What were some of the
events leading up to Franklin's famous statement ?
Several decades
earlier, in the 1750s, the Colonies were very
prosperous. There was no income tax, no unemployment, and stable
prices. When asked to explain this prosperity to leaders back
in the motherland, Benjamin Franklin replied;
"That is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It
is called Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportion to the
demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the
producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for
ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we
have no interest to pay to no one".
1764, the production of Colonial Script was made
illegal by the Currency Act, passed into law in England (of
course due to pressure from the Bank of England) prohibiting the
Colonies from issuing their own money,
ordering them to use only the money that was provided (in insufficient quantities) by the English
bankers. Benjamin Franklin said,
"In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era
of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that
the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed".
The effect that the English bankers were having on the
Colonies was by far the most significant reason for
the Revolutionary War in 1775, in contrast
to what is taught in our history books. Benjamin Franklin
was clear about this;
"The colonies would gladly have borne
the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been for the poverty caused by the bad
influence of English bankers on
the parliament which has caused, in the
colonies, hatred of England and the revolutionary war".
Although the Declaration of Independence was made in 1776, it
wasn't until the Treaty of Paris in 1783 that
the new sovereign nation was recognized. The
Colonies were once again free to control their own currency. In 1787,
the founding fathers made certain that the control of
currency was provided for in the United States
Constitution. Article 1, section 8, paragraph 5, states;
"The Congress shall have the
power to coin money and
to regulate the value thereof".
It's clear that the issuance of currency is of utmost importance
to any free society. The abuse and/or exploitation
of the issuance of currency has been alluded to by a
great many influential
people throughout history.
And although the Colonies had gained their independence,
the flegling country was far from out of the dark. Enter the
looters (to borrow Rand's terminology) of the era, the
Rothschilds. The Rothschilds were expert looters, ie; they had
figured out how to enrich themselves at the expense of people who
actually worked and produced.
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation,
and I care not who makes its laws."
Mayer Amschel Rothschild
It has been said that "the wealth of Rothschild consists of
the bankruptcy of nations". It has also
been said that "the19th century was the age of theRothschilds",
and estimated that during this period the Rothschilds
owned
as much as half of the world's total wealth. Though
this is a bit hard for me to believe, suffice to say that they were
extremely wealthy and
powerful. They were
bankers, yet they controlled and
manipulated entire governments because they controlled "national
banks" and thus the issuance of currency.Benjamin
Disraeli characterized Nathan Rothschild as "the lord and master of
the money markets of the world, and of course virtally lord and master
of everything else."
Nathan Rothschild ran the Bank of England during the
period when the 13 Colonies sought their independence.
He understood the potential of the new fledgling country in North
America and the problems it could pose to imperial England in the
future. Though the British could easily have crushed the Colonies
in
the American Revolution, they didn't need
to. England would be better served by allowing independence
and establishing a "national bank" on the United State's
soil which England would control. Alexander Hamilton, the
Minister of Finance, supported the idea of such a bank, but Thomas
Jefferson, the Secretary of State, strongly opposed it.
Jefferson's opposition to central bankers is legendary;
"I place economy among the
first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of
dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load
us with perpetual debt." ... "I sincerely believe that banking establishments are
more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending
money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but
swindling futurity on a large scale" ...
"If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation then by deflation, the banks and the corporations will grow
up around them, will deprive the people of all property until their
children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The
issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the
people, to whom it properly belongs."
President Washington eventually sided with his Finance
Minister, under the premise that making funds available for
business and strengthening the national economy was desirable,
and the cleverly named The Bank of the United States
was established in 1791 with a 20 year
charter. When the charter ran out in 1811,
Congress voted against it's renewal on the grounds that it was
unconstitutional.. The Bank of
England, under the direction of Nathan Rothschild, declared that either
the renewal of the charter be granted, or the United States would find
itself in "a most disastrous war". Nevertheless, on
March 4,1811 the Bank of the United States was dissolved.
And on January 20, 1815, President Madison
vetoed another bill that would have created a second National
Bank. But finally, on January 8, 1816, faced
with the financial hardship from the War of 1812 (just as Nathan
Rothschild had promised...) Congress approved another "national
bank".
In 1832,
President Andrew Jackson vetoed another move to renew the charter
of the 'Bank of the United States' . As a
result the bank went out of business in 1836. President
Jackson was the only one of our presidents whose administration
totally abolished the National Debt.
"Gentlemen,
I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you
have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the
country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when
you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the
deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand
families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I
let you go on you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be
my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout
you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!"
When asked what he felt was
the greatest achievement of his career Andrew Jackson replied, "I
killed the bank!"
James Garfield became President in 1881.
With regard to the European bankers, he said;
"Whosoever controls the volume of money in any
country is absolute master of all industry and commerce... And when you
realise that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or
another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told
how periods of inflation and depression originate."
Today our central bank is call ed "The Fed",
or 'Federal Reserve', again a clever and intentionally
misleading name. (Similiarly the "Bank of England" is nothing of the
sort, but cleverly named to instill confidence in the populace.
The bank sold shares to "private
investors", the names of which were never disclosed.)
After signing the act in 1913,
President Wilson
said;
"A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of
credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of
the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few
men . We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most
completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized
world, no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government
by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the
opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men."
"Since I entered politics, I
have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the
biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and
manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know
that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful,
so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not
speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
( both from The New Freedom:
A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People (New
York and Garden City: Doubleday, Page and Company, 1913)
Just after the Federal
Reserve
Act
was passed, Congressman Charles Lindbergh said,
"the
act established the
most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bll,
the invisible government of the monetary power will be
legalized" ... "the greatest
crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill."
The
international bankers had created a currency panic in 1907
in order to get the American people to swallow the idea of
the 'Federal Reserve', in classic Hegelian dialectic
form; thesis plus antithesis equals synthesis.
First foment a crisis. Then, in response to the ensuing public outcry,
ride in on white horses, offer a
solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but
which people would have been unwilling to accept initially. (In
this same manner the global elite convince us to give up our
constitutional rights, a la
the The
Patriot
Act ...
in the name of fighting terrorists.)
In
1911, John Moody's "The Seven Men" was in McClure's
Magazine. In it he states;
"Seven
men on Wall Street now control a great share of the fundamental
industry and resources of the United States. Three of the seven men,
J.P. Morgan, James J. Hill, George F. Baker, head of the First National
Bank of New York belong to the so-called Morgan group; four of them,
John D. and William Rockefeller, James Stillman, head of the National
City Bank, and Jacob H. Schiff on the private banking firm of Kuhn,
Loeb Company, to the so-called Standard Oil City Bank group...the
central machine of capital extends its control over the United
States...The process is not only economically logical; it is now
practically automatic."
Consider
the function of the Fed. Today's dollar is
"fiat money", meaning it is not backed by anything of value (gold) as
it used to be, but it is backed only by government decree, by the "full
faith and credit" of the United States government. What
are the economic
effects of printing money carte blanche, ie; uninhibited by
the need to have something of real value (and therefore
something of limited supply...) behind the currency ? With
gold backing, there is something quantifiable
behind our money, something of precise value that keeps money creation
and thus economic growth
in check. Currently,
getting more money is as easy as
turning on the printing presses (incurring more debt...)
printing dollars by pure fiat, 'out of thin air', as
it were. Problem is, our government has to issue bonds to get
those dollars. This arrangement is great for whoever is running
The Fed... whoever is recieving
the bonds... but not so great
for the
government that issues them. In making good on the bonds they
issue, our
government not only has to pay full face dollar value (on dollars that
cost about 5 cents for the Fed bankers to print) but interest as well
! The US Government, (ie; you and
I) gets strapped with the bill each time the "Fed "
turns on it's printing presses. In this manner, our
government is taken to
the cleaners by our own central bank. To add
insult to injury, every time
new dollars are printed and the money supply increases, your income and
savings are worth less. This has been referred to as a "stealth tax."
In
lockstep, our national debt goes through the roof.The national
debt now exceeds 8 trillion dollars.
The number increases
tens of thousands of dollarsevery second, and several
billion per day. Here is
some information regarding how the national debt has increased over the decades (since 1940), as well as who
we owe all that money to. Not surprisingly, we owe more to the
FED than any other source. But how could we owe ourselves money
? (Isn't the Fed part of our Federal government ??) Clearly
it
is not..
And
look at
the graph (scroll
down...) US
National Debt From
1940 to Present . Is it a coincidence that we see a
massive acceleration of national debt in the early
1970s, precisely when President
Nixon announced that the government
was abandoning the Bretton Woods Agreement (August
15, 1971),
removing gold
backing from the dollar ?
articles:
"It is
indeed important to denationalize gold--to get it out of Fort Knox and
into the hands of the people. But it is just as, if not more, important
to denationalize the dollar--that is, to tie the name "dollar" firmly
and irretrievably to a fixed weight of gold. Every piece of gold at
Fort Knox would be tied to the dollar, and then, and only then, the
Federal Reserve System could be swiftly abolished, and the gold poured
back into the hands of the public at the fixed dollar weights."
(entire article)
..."Modern central
banks function as the prime instigators for the emergence of
unsustainable booms, then they show up as the saviours of the bust.
While imposing as the navigators, they act as the prime instigators of
the very instability they are called to fight. Greenspan has
played this game in all its virtuosity. With a masterful hand, the
current chairman has wielded the levers of monetary stimuli. He has
given the financial markets what they want: a lender of the last resort
that could be banked on. When one debt-driven boom had turned into
bust, he managed to make sure that another one would begin.
The key to the power of a central bank is maintaining the
illusion that fiduciary money is wealth. It is a con game, and in this
respect there can be few doubts that Alan Greenspan has been a master
at this game. Under his rule, the arcane machinery of the central bank
has turned into a fountain of cheap money, which has inundated the
globe. This policy of repeated bailouts and the provision of unlimited
funding for government expansion in the face of a decreasing savings
rate and a shrinking productive sector is the way toward an economic
Armageddon. By functioning as bailout agents central
banks use the power to create money as a power to destroy."
(entire article)
"There is no subtler,
no surer means of
overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.
The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side
of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million
can diagnose."
John
Maynard Keynes(The Economic
Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235)
"This
is the shabby secret of
the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply
a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this
insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one
grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists'
antagonism toward the gold standard."
Alan Greenspan (last paragraph)
from "Gold and
Economic Freedom",
published in Ayn Rand's "Objectivist" newsletter in 1966